Look, snicks out or not out decisions being reviewed is good enough but when it comes to LBW review, I think there is a room of improvement. Frankly speaking, if you look at the umpires in the first Eng/WI test, they have given NOT OUT to almost all LBW appeals by the West Indian bowlers and almost all were reviewed by WI and almost all were given OUT by the third umpire. On the other hand, when England bowlers bowled, almost ALL LBW appeals were given OUT and almost ALL were reviewed by the WI batsmen and almost ALL were given NOT OUT by the third umpire. This is my personal opinion but I see a little bias in the LBW umpiring decisions, that seem to go into England's favor. Is this due to white folks having a revenge in the current black lives matter atmosphere? I don't know and I don't wanna throw in the racial card - BUT - something doesn't seem right here. IMO, Umpire's call is BS in LBW decisions. If the bowler or the batsman decides to review then, umpires call should have absolutely NO SAY. All three red dots, it's OUT! On or more yellow or green dot, it's NOT OUT! as simple as that.